| Blackjackdavey | La contamination radioactive du pacifique depuis Fukushima |
0 #1 |
|---|---|---|
|
Je poste trop
 
Inscrit: 05/01/2010 17:02
Post(s): 10748
Karma: 1080 |
Contribution le : 08/04/2012 22:53
|
|
 Signaler 
|
|
|
| leozero | 0 #2 |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Je masterise !
 
Inscrit: 18/10/2007 21:56
Post(s): 4876
Karma: 221 |
Contribution le : 08/04/2012 22:55
|
|
|
Signaler
|
|
|
| Sloth | 0 #3 |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Je masterise !
Inscrit: 10/03/2007 15:07
Post(s): 3447
Karma: 73 |
T'façon nous n'avions déjà plus le droit de manger du poisson à cause des métaux lourds, alors bon.
Contribution le : 08/04/2012 22:58
|
|
|
Signaler
|
|
|
| aioren | 0 #4 |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Je poste trop
Inscrit: 07/09/2004 22:27
Post(s): 14002
Karma: 3937 |
Sur le site source : http://www.asrltd.com/japan/plume.php
Citation : We use a Lagrangian particles dispersal method to track where free floating material (fish larvae, algae, phytoplankton, zooplankton...) present in the sea water near the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station plant could have gone since the earthquake on March 11th. THIS IS NOT A REPRESENTATION OF THE RADIOACTIVE PLUME CONCENTRATION. Since we do not know exactly how much contaminated water and at what concentration was released into the ocean, it is impossible to estimate the extent and dilution of the plume. However, field monitoring by TEPCO showed concentration of radioactive Iodine and Cesium higher than the legal limit during the next two months following the event (with a peak at more than 100 Bq/cm3 early April 2011 for I-131 as shown by the following picture). Bon, bah... Bien tenté 
Contribution le : 08/04/2012 23:21
|
|
|
Signaler
|
|
|
| -Melon- | 0 #5 |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Je masterise !
Inscrit: 13/04/2010 22:05
Post(s): 3337
Karma: 175 |
Contribution le : 08/04/2012 23:32
|
|
|
Signaler
|
|
|